Multiple-scale analysis is a global perturbation scheme that is usefulin systems characterized by disparate time scales, such as weakdissipation in an oscillator. These effects could be insignificant on short time scales but become importanton long time scales. Classical perturbation methods generally breakdown because of resonances that lead to what are called secularterms. It should be noted that HMM represents a compromise between accuracyand feasibility, since it requires a preconceived form of themacroscale model to begin with. To see why this is necessary, justnote that even for the situation when we do know the macroscale modelin complete detail, selecting the right algorithm to solve themacroscale model is still often a non-trivial matter.

Multiple-Scale Analysis

Integrating graph-based approaches, this study transforms vibration analysis, allowing an in-depth view of nonlinear behaviors in vibrational data. Using the Tri-Axial Vibro-Dynamic Stone Classification (TVDSC) dataset, which captures fine-grained acceleration profiles from controlled stone-crushing experiments, we reveal complex temporal dynamics specific to stone size classes. Applying a 12-level Maximal Overlap Discrete Wavelet Transform for multiscale decomposition, each signal is segmented into transition graphs that quantify both transient and stable structural features. We analyze these multi-scale analysis networks with graph complexity metrics—Shannon and Von Neumann entropy, spectral radius, Lyapunov exponent, and fractal dimension—that elucidate the stochasticity, stability, and connectivity within the temporal sequences.

Access this book

Multiscale topology optimization frameworks are typically founded upon the assumptions of linear elasticity (Coman 2019), as this permits a significant reduction in the computational expense of analysis at both scales. This enables functional objectives cast exclusively as a function of infinitesimal displacements to be efficiently targeted without loss of accuracy (Christensen et al. 2023). Consequently, to permit application within these domains, it is necessary to extend the structural analysis at both scales to enable succinct operation within the materially and geometrically nonlinear regimes. In sequential multiscalemodeling, one has a macroscale model in which some details of theconstitutive relations are precomputed using microscale models.

Multiscale Analysis, Modeling and Computation

A unifying theme throughout the collection is the emphasis on a solid mathematical foundation, which serves as the basis for the most efficient numerical algorithms used to simulate complex phenomena. Averaging methods were developed originally for the analysis ofordinary differential equations with multiple time scales. The mainidea is to obtain effective equations for the slow variables over longtime scales by averaging over the fast oscillations of the fastvariables (Arnold, 1983). Averaging methods can be considered as aspecial case of the technique of multiple time scale expansions(Bender and Orszag, 1978). The other extreme is to work with a microscale model, such as the first principle of quantum mechanics. As was declared by Dirac back in 1929 (Dirac, 1929), the right physical principle for most of what we are interested in is already provided by the principles of quantum mechanics, there is no need to look further.

\( \textitdi\upsilon \) u = f in Critical Spaces»>

• Forexample, if the microscale model is the NVT ensemble of moleculardynamics, \(d\) might be the temperature.
• W. Zhang, «Analysis of the heterogeneous multiscale method for elliptic homogenization problems,» preprint.
• We refer to thefirst type as type A problems and the second type as type B problems.
• When the system varies on a macroscopic scale, theseconserved densities also vary, and their dynamics is described by aset of hydrodynamic equations (Spohn, 1991).
• Multiscale topology optimization frameworks are typically founded upon the assumptions of linear elasticity (Coman 2019), as this permits a significant reduction in the computational expense of analysis at both scales.
• In all instances, the deformation profile is successfully obtained through continuous optimization of the amplitude parameters.

The recent surge of multiscale modeling from the smallest scale (atoms) to full system level (e.g., autos) related to solid mechanics that has now grown into an international multidisciplinary activity was birthed from an unlikely source. Since the US Department of Energy (DOE) national labs started to reduce nuclear underground tests in the mid-1980s, with the last one in 1992, the idea of simulation-based design and analysis concepts were birthed. Multiscale modeling was a key in garnering more precise and accurate predictive tools. In essence, the number of large-scale systems level tests that were previously used to validate a design was reduced to nothing, thus warranting the increase in simulation results of the complex systems for design verification and validation purposes.

• To verify the accuracy of the optimized structures, high-fidelity single-scale simulations are performed.
• Homogenization methods can be applied to many other problems of thistype, in which a heterogeneous behavior is approximated at the largescale by a slowly varying or homogeneous behavior.
• The microscale model is concurrently coupled to the macroscale model such that only the microscale parameter space traversed by the optimizer is resolved during the optimization procedure, leading to a significant reduction in the computational expense of analysis.
• Moreover, to minimize strain overshoot and consequently exceeding the strain bounds (see Table 1), five intermediate uniformly spaced load steps are employed in all cases.
• At SNL, the multiscale modeling effort was an engineering top-down approach starting from continuum mechanics perspective, which was already rich with a computational paradigm.

Precomputing the inter-atomic forces asfunctions of the positions of all the atoms in the system is notpractical since there are too many independent variables. On the otherhand, in a typical simulation, one only probes an extremely smallportion of the potential energy surface. Concurrent coupling allowsone to evaluate these forces at the locations where they are needed. Roughly speaking, one might regard HMM as an example of the top-downapproach and the equation-free as an example of the bottom-upapproach. In HMM, the starting point is the macroscale model, themicroscale model is used to supplement the missing data in themacroscale model.